|
NEWS AND COMMENTS
•
Pandemic flu in Croatia, phase of delay
Pandemic flu came
to Croatia at the beginning of July 2009 (see ENEWS 7/2009). This triggered the
activation of appropriate parts of the National preparedness plan, i.e. delaying
phase. Main measures of this phase are:
No restriction in
international travel, either at entry nor regarding departure to any part of the
world. However advice for travelers was released saying that it is wise to
postpone a trip if ill with fever (at exit or before entry) and to seek medical
advice and help (in accordance with WHO recommendations).
On all
international points of entry to Croatia, a written information for travelers
advised them that anybody experiencing respiratory disease with fever in 7 days
since entering Croatia, should visit a nearest infectology hospital ward for
diagnostics and treatment including antiviral drugs.
For this reason as
well as for needs of postexposure prophylaxis of contacts, an amount of
antiviral drugs was promptly distributed to the field, to all Counties, from
the central stock.
Every case of
suspected pandemic flu was processed by the following algorithm: Information
about the patient was promptly sent (by phone) at any time to a
doctor-epidemiologist on duty at the Epidemiology service of the Croatian
national institute of public health. He(she) promptly informs a field
epidemiologist (county institute of public health), who pays a home visit,
detects persons in close (family) contact with the patient and offers them
postexposure antiviral prophylaxis.
Respiratory
samples from all patients are sent to Virology laboratory of the National
influenza center at the Croatian national institute of public health. Tests were
performed regardless of the working time and results reported promptly by phone
to central national Epidemiology service of the CNIPH. Epidemiology service
passes all results promptly by phone to clinicians who sent the samples, as a
help in diagnosis and treatment (written test results came later in usual
manner). This enabled that at any time complete overview of current
epidemiological situation was possible at national level, necessary for all
significant decisions of the central pandemic headquarters. Close family
contacts under chemoprophylaxis could continue their duties and normal life,
with reduced possibilities of transmitting and spreading the infection.
The main purpose
and aim of this phase, was to enter the cold season at as low as possible level
of flu, which could influence the main outbreak intensity. The results were
favorable:
Mostly imported
cases were registered (in persons coming from abroad already infected) as a
natural consequence of uninterrupted international movement of people mainly
tourists, with only small number of domestic cases which was very probably a
consequence of the fact that nt one of close contacts of virologically confirmed
pandemic flu cases, that received antiviral chemprophylaxis, got the disease.
There were no tertiary cases.
All diseased were
treated optimally and recovered fully. There were no fatal cases.
However, with an
increasing number of cases, such a tactic obviously become more difficult or
impossible to perform. Then the next phase takes place i.e. phase of mitigation
of pandemic impact, lasting in fact, in one way or another, through the entire
pandemic wave (waves). A heavy weight of measures is transferred mainly to
diseased persons. The majority of patients are treated at their family doctors
i.e. in primary health care (like in seasonal flu outbreaks) and only seriously
ill patients or patients with underlying chronic diseases, are hospitalized in
order to save a part of hospital capacities for patients with other diseases,
particularly those vitally endangered.
Beside that,
measures for preservation of function of entire health care system under the
pressure of mass morbidity as well as for maintenance of vital social functions
possibly compromised by a mass morbidity, are applied. The majority of antiviral
drugs are reserved for treatment of (seriously) ill flu patients, systematic
postexposure prophylaxis is abandoned. Virological tests are not performed
(understandably) in all patients, but only if the result is clinically important
(differential diagnosis, guiding a proper therapy), or on the other hand is
epidemiologically important for instance to clarify etiology of influenza like
clusters. In addition, a planed virological sampling will be performed during
the entire pandemic wave to give the information about potential and possible
changes of viral characteristics (virulence, resistance etc). During this entire
phase, the planed stepwise vaccination of population is performed too.
Daily information
on newly discovered and confirmed pandemic flu cases in Croatia is published,
since the first cases untill now, on the web site of the Croatian national
institute of public health: www.hzjz.hr, along with relevant information
and guidelines for citizens and health workers.
•
Salmonellae in circulation in 2008
Basing on
individual salmonellosis case reports, which in 2008 numbered 3664, here we are
giving an overview of detected serovariants (Table).
Table 1
Salmonella serovariants in salmonellosis patients in Croatia 2008.
|
S. Abony |
S. Mbandaka |
|
S. Agona |
S. Muenster |
|
S. Anatum |
S. Newport |
|
S. Bareilli |
S. paratyphi
B |
|
S. Bovis
morbificans |
S. paratyphi
C |
|
S. Chester |
S. Rissen |
|
S. Coeln |
S. Senftenberg |
|
S. Corvalis |
S. Stanley |
|
S. Derby |
S. Tennessee |
|
S. Enteritidis |
S. Thompson |
|
S. Give |
S. Tosamanga |
|
S. Goldcoast |
S. Typhimuirum |
|
S. Heidelberg |
S. Umbilo |
|
S. Indico |
S. Veneziana |
|
S. Infantis |
S. Virchow |
|
S. Java |
S. Waragul |
|
S. Kottbus |
S. Weltverden |
|
S. Litchfield |
S. Wien |
Salmonella
enteritidis
was most prominent, like in previous years.

|